Bag's Rants

A look to the future.

I was watching Spongebob Squarepants earlier, don't ask, and there was a session with a character who was down on his luck. Spongebob took pity on him and brought him into his house and ended up pampering him for months. I know it's a kid’s story but it got me thinking. At the same time I was thinking about the complaints made by child free couples about paying for children via taxation. A part of a previous article.

They got me thinking about the way we support certain schemes via a central purse and the way things appear to be going. That then got me looking at where we are going long term, with unfortunate results. I had an epiphany on several issues and felt like a rant.

One of those was about the long term future of the British people. The issue is that it appears it's all the 'wrong' people that are having kids. It's a class type issue. Our working families generally have a maximum of two kids but we have single mums on the social with several kids from different fathers. It's mainly the ones who need support who are having kids whilst the ones in the good jobs that are avoiding having kids. Unfortunately, the ones in jobs are the ones who have been interviewed and selected for those jobs based mainly on intelligence and ability. It's Darwinism in reverse.

In Darwin's theory natural evolution allows the strong to live while the weak perish. The weak perishing means they do not get to reproduce and weaken the race as a whole. Now along comes our social engineering and this allows the weak to reproduce and 'weakens' the entire race. Now I know this is eugenics and it has a very bad name but is it wrong?

In addition we have all the immigrants coming into the UK where they live among their own kind, don’t integrate and pick up benefits. They are also having kids who don’t conform to the new society they live in but instead still follow the path of their homeland. In some cases bringing traditions which were old before the industrial revolution. It’s a form of invasion.

We can even see this in nature now. If you want to see what is going on look at the introduction and invasion of the Grey Squirrel which has virtually annihilated the native Red Squirrel. Grey Squirrels are regarded as pests but the Red is protected as it is endangered. This by itself is a prime example of our society screwing up nature because we know better. Grey Squirrels were introduced by humans to the UK for several decades starting from approx. 1876. Once the Grey is established the Red Squirrel cannot compete and dies out. For more details read here.

We are now seeing a similar competition in humans. The competition is such that those with good jobs do not have the time or inclination to have children and as a replacement we have a new class in the UK. The child bearing class. Funded by the social and pushed to have a child every few years outside of what our society sees as a stable family life to maximize their income. Studies show children born in these environments tend to have poor educational ability and a tendency for antisocial behavior. I believe that we should no longer encourage those that cannot look after their offspring to have any. This would at the very least reduce the load on our funds. We need to help those that we can but not by providing them with so much encouragement to drop yet more unwanted kids on the world but by aiding those that look after their kids and ensure they get a good education. One way we could do this by not paying people based on how many kids they have but instead reduce tax liabilities and increase availability of aid for working families. Things like free meals and extended hours at schools to enable parents to have more flexible arrangements at work. I'm sure there are other options to encourage our society to grow. Regardless of our Child bearing class we are still running at -ve population growth. Not a good sign for the future.

So the fact is that the natives in the UK are in decline. Our population growth is -ve. How can this be so? Our statistics show an increase in population. This is due to immigration. Soon we will have reduced our own numbers so much that we will eventually be overtaken by immigrants and their offspring. An interesting dilemma. Here we are being forced to fund aid to places like Africa, who cannot sustain themselves without it and take in refugees with little or no education and keep them at a much higher standard than they could live at home. It looks like the US, EU and Oz will be in the same boat as us with this. Westerners are a dying breed due to our good natured attempts to help those less fortunate.

I hate to say it but Enoch Powell was a visionary. I think his solutions are unacceptable though. Surely we can come up with a better one.

In the meantime I'm being told I have to work longer to keep funding a growing bunch of social claimants. While I am being robbed, via taxes, by a Government which cannot look at anything beyond the short term and it's own feel good control policies. You can't comment on it as your as seen as a bigot by the PC crowd and, if our free country, cough, can even get jail time for having such a opinion in opposition to the Government.

Is this situation really sustainable? I no longer believe so. Can we fix it? Well we could by changing our social system and forcing the immigrants to blend in with our culture. Get rid of the PC crowd and introduce a new British society. One based on ability without a support system for those not willing to change. Will we do it? Nope, I believe it will continue until we have race wars when we will be forced to throw away our civilised veneer and we will enter a dark age on this planet. Who will win? Well, the Chinese and Indians have just under 3B people between them alone. The EU, US and Oz have about 1B. That leaves about 2B for the rest of the world. Most of whom don't like us either. So 5B against 1B. You do the maths.

posted by Bag @ 8:16 pm