Thursday, December 15, 2005

I hate this as a policy. How is it Justice?

This GP has been cleared of murder in a court judged by his peers. The prosecution explained what they thought he explained what he did and the jury believed him. Read more here.

Now, clearly frustrated that they think he is guilty, they are resurrecting more cases covering different periods. Why were these cases not put forward before? It seems there was insufficient evidence. Read more here.

This must be a travesty of justice. They must be putting so much stress on this guy that he could pop his clogs. Maybe that is what they want. No defence means that the cases would be clear cut and he would be found guilty. That would justify their jobs.

Or, they may have found new evidence. You know, wink wink, Sgt Smith-Jones, lately of the West Midland Serious Crimes Unit (retired) did a little looking and came across this new bit of evidence. Honest. Here it is and it clearly proves our cases.

And they call this Justice.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home